Skip to content
Katia Chavez LawImmigration · PLLC
Request a Consultation

Practice Area

Asylum and Humanitarian Relief

There are two completely different ways an asylum claim gets decided, and which one you are on changes almost everything: who hears you, who argues against you, and who brings the interpreter.

The deadline most people miss

One year from last arrival
The general filing deadline for asylum, measured from the date you last entered the United States.
Two narrow exceptions
Changed circumstances materially affecting eligibility, or extraordinary circumstances explaining the delay — and you must still file within a reasonable time.
Form I-589
The application for asylum and for withholding of removal.

The one-year clock does not pause.It runs from your last arrival, not from when you learned about it or when your situation at home got worse. If you are close to it or past it, that is the first thing to discuss.

Where you stand

Affirmative or defensive. It is not a choice you make.

An affirmative case is one you bring yourself. You must be physically present in the United States, and you may apply regardless of how you arrived or what your current status is. You file Form I-589, Application for Asylum and for Withholding of Removal, with USCIS and you are interviewed by an asylum officer.

A defensive case is asylum raised as a defence against removal. You are in proceedings before an immigration judge, and the government is represented by an attorney from Immigration and Customs Enforcement. It is adversarial in a way the affirmative interview is not.

People generally land in the defensive process one of two ways: USCIS did not approve the affirmative application and referred the case to a judge, or they were placed in removal proceedings directly. A referral is not a denial in the ordinary sense — the judge conducts a de novo hearing, meaning a fresh hearing with a decision independent of what USCIS concluded.

If USCIS lacks jurisdiction, the asylum office may instead issue Form I-863, a Notice of Referral to Immigration Judge, for an asylum-only hearing.

Practical differences

The same claim, argued in two very different rooms.

These are not technicalities. They change how you prepare, who is in the room, and what happens if something goes wrong on the day.

01

Affirmative, before USCIS

  • You have not been placed in removal proceedings.
  • You submit Form I-589 to USCIS yourself.
  • The interview is non-adversarial, in front of an asylum officer. Nobody is there to argue against you.
  • You must provide your own qualified interpreter if you need one.
  • You may live in the United States while the application is pending.
  • Affirmative applicants are rarely detained by ICE.
02

Defensive, before a judge

  • You are already in removal proceedings.
  • If USCIS referred you, the application you filed carries over. If you have not filed one, you file it with the court.
  • The hearing is adversarial. An ICE attorney appears for the government.
  • The court provides the interpreter, for the hearing and for all other proceedings.
  • If the judge finds you ineligible for asylum, they consider other forms of relief before ordering removal.
  • Either party may appeal the decision.

Before you file

What actually carries an asylum case.

The application form is the smallest part of the work. What decides most cases is the record built around it.

  1. Your own account, written carefully and consistently. Contradictions between the declaration, the interview and the testimony are what claims most often founder on.
  2. Proof of when you last arrived, because the one-year deadline is measured from that date.
  3. Evidence of what happened to you: medical records, police reports, photographs, court or government documents, anything contemporaneous.
  4. Evidence about conditions in your country, tied specifically to your situation rather than general reporting.
  5. Witnesses who can speak to what they saw or know first hand, and are willing to say so.
  6. An honest account of anything difficult in your history. It is far better addressed by your own attorney early than raised by the government later.

How we work

Full representation, application through decision.

Representation runs from the application through the interview or the court proceedings, not just to the point of filing. You work directly with the attorney handling your case, not a rotating intake team.

If an affirmative case is referred to an immigration judge, the case does not change hands. The same attorney who prepared the application argues it in court, which matters because the record you built is the record you defend.

If it goes further than that, appellate work before the Board of Immigration Appeals is handled here as well. If you are not sure which stage you are at, an immigration consultation is the place to start.

Work authorisation

Asylum applicants are not automatically permitted to work. Employment authorisation depends on meeting specific requirements and on timing tied to your application. Ask about your particular situation rather than relying on what someone else’s timeline looked like.

Common questions

Asylum, answered plainly.

Does how I entered the country matter?

For the affirmative process, you may apply for asylum regardless of how you arrived in the United States or what your current immigration status is. What you do need is to be physically present in the country. How you entered can matter for other reasons in a case, which is worth discussing directly.

I have been here more than a year. Is it over?

Not necessarily, but you have to fit an exception. The deadline can be excused where there are changed circumstances that materially affect your eligibility, or extraordinary circumstances relating to the delay in filing — and in either case you must still have filed within a reasonable amount of time given those circumstances. This is fact-specific and worth reviewing with an attorney rather than guessing.

What happens if USCIS does not approve my application?

If your case is not approved and you do not have a lawful immigration status, USCIS issues a Notice to Appear and refers the case to an immigration judge. The judge hears the case de novo, meaning fresh, and reaches a decision independent of what USCIS decided. You can remain in the United States while the application is pending before the judge.

Do I need to bring an interpreter?

For an affirmative asylum interview at USCIS, you are generally responsible for providing a qualified interpreter. In immigration court the position is reversed: the court provides a qualified interpreter for the hearing and other proceedings. Interpreter requirements have been changed by temporary rules before, so confirm the current position before your interview date.

Can I work while I wait?

Not automatically. Asylum applicants are not authorised to work unless they meet certain requirements. Whether and when you qualify depends on your specific application and its timing, so it is not something to assume from someone else’s experience.

Will I be detained?

USCIS states that affirmative asylum applicants are rarely detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Detention is a different question if you are already in removal proceedings, where bond may be available in certain circumstances. That is covered under removal defense.

General information on this page reflects published guidance from U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services at USCIS asylum guidance and the U.S. Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review. Asylum rules, filing locations and interpreter requirements change, sometimes by temporary rule. This page is general information, not legal advice, and it does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Contact

Get in touch.

Whether you’re ready to begin or simply have questions,

tation

Submitting this form does not create an attorney–client relationship. Please do not include confidential details.